| 摘要: |
| 构建具有中国特色的自主法学学科体系和学术体系，首先需要对十个二级学科的发展状况进行梳理，从而勾勒出中国法学学科体系的整体图景。本文以中国人文社会科学综合评价资源库的数据为基础，以知识生产能力为观察视角，以知识生产的机构、作者、作品及其影响力等视角，展示了中国法学在2009—2018年间的发展情况。从整体上看，法学十个二级学科在这十年间都积极参与高层次的论文发表与知识生产，但在学术资源配置、论文产出数量、学术共同体规模、人才梯队建设、学术作品影响力等方面，不同二级学科之间存在一定的差异。以五院四系和几个新兴法学院为代表的头部法学院可以做到十个二级学科的协调发展，而更多的法学院则在不同方面存在学科短板。一所大学的发展或许可采用差异化竞争策略，但法学学科体系的建设不宜有短板，因为法学是一门实践性的学问，十个二级学科的知识联动才能推动整体意义上的法治。因此，在充分把握不同二级学科发展现状的基础上补齐短板、优化人才梯队、坚持学术导向、构建良好的学术竞争机制，将有助于提升法学知识生产的整体质量与效率，也是构建中国自主法学学科体系和学术体系的基础所在。 |
| 关键词: 自主法学知识体系 法学学科 学术机构 法学院论文 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Ten-Year Development of the Ten Secondary Disciplines of Chinese Legal Science: An Observation from the Perspective of Knowledge Production |
|
Song Yahui etc.
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| To establish a legal disciplinary and academic system with Chinese characteristics, it’s crucial to assess the development of the ten sub-disciplines of Chinese legal discipline, so as to outline the overall landscape of Chinese legal discipline. Based on the data of China Humanities and Social Sciences Comprehensive Evaluation Resource Library, this paper shows the development of Chinese legal discipline during 20092018 by focusing on the institutions, authors, works and their academic influence, with the knowledge production capacity as the observation perspective. During this decade, numerous high-level papers have been published in all legal sub-disciplines, while there are differences among different sub-disciplines in terms of academic resource allocation, the number of published papers, the size of academic communities, the construction of talent echelon, and the influence of academic works. The head law schools represented by the “Five Universities of Politics and Law”, the “Four Law Schools” and several emerging law schools can achieve the coordinated development of ten sub-disciplines, while more law schools have shortcomings in certain sub-disciplines. Universities may adopt differentiated competitive strategies, while the construction of the legal discipline system should avoid shortcomings in some sub-disciplines, because the legal discipline must be practical, and only the knowledge linkage of the ten sub-disciplines can promote the rule of law. Thus, on the basis of fully grasping the development status of each sub-discipline, adressing the shortcomings, optimising the talent echelon, adhering to the academic orientation, and establishing a good competition mechanism will help to improve the overall quality and efficiency of legal knowledge production, which is the basis for the establishment of Chinese self-independent legal disciplinary system and academic system. |
| Key words: Self-independent Knowledge System of Legal Science, Legal Discipline, Academic Institution, Law School, Thesis |
