摘要: |
《公司法解释四》第4条规定,因程序瑕疵提起决议撤销之诉,如程序瑕疵轻微且未造成实质影响的,法院可裁量不予撤销。有关裁判的实证研究表明,裁量驳回的适用存在“涵摄”的事实审和“利益衡量”的价值审等两模式,前者因循概念法学的僵化逻辑,无法胜任个案裁决的技术,后者意识到裁量驳回的价值判断属性,但多数裁判着眼于单个利益要素,对背后的利益结构缺乏整体认识,且适用方法简单,难免恣意。妥当的个案裁决技术需要进一步修正改造“利益衡量”价值审模式,在学理上阐明裁量驳回与决议撤销之诉的体系关系,明晰适用要件,明确决议撤销之诉的功能定位;在功能定位指引下确定裁量驳回中利益衡量之界限、结构与方式,防止自由裁量权被异化。 |
关键词: 决议可撤销之诉 裁量驳回 利益衡量 轻微瑕疵 价值判断 |
DOI: |
分类号: |
基金项目: |
|
Interest Measurements of Discretionary Dismissal for Resolution Revocation Lawsuit |
Li Jianwei & He Bingze
|
|
Abstract: |
Article 4 of the Company Law Interpretation IV stipulates that if a resolution revocation lawsuit is filed due to procedural defects, the court may, at its discretion, not revoke it if the procedural defects are minor and do not cause substantial impact. The empirical study of the judgements shows that the application of discretionary dismissal exists in two modes, factual trial of “subsumption” and value trial of “interest measurement”, with the former following the rigid logic of conceptual jurisprudence and being unable to handle the technology of case-by-case decision, and the latter being aware of the value judgment attribute of discretionary dismissal. However, most of the decisions focus on the individual elements of interest, lacking a holistic understanding of the underlying interest structure, and applying simple and arbitrary methods. A proper case-by-case adjudication technique requires further revision and modification of the “interest measurement” value judgment model, clarification of the systemic relationship between discretionary dismissal and resolution revocation, clarification of the applicable elements, and clarification of the functional position of resolution revocation; the boundaries, structure and manner of interest measurements in discretionary dismissal need to be determined under the guidance of functional orientation to prevent the alienation of discretionary power. |
Key words: Resolution Revocation Lawsuit, Discretionary Dismissal, Interest Measurement, Minor Defects, Value Judgement |