| 摘要: |
| 新一轮公司法修订工作已启动，从宏观层面探讨并反思公司法规则变迁无疑意义重大。脱法实践作为一种“失范的自治行为”与公司法规则变迁紧密相连，并存在耦合基础，即法的社会性、价值性与不完备性与脱法行为的实践性、逐利性和指向性具有相通、相倚和相成的共性。脱法实践与公司法规则变迁之间产生耦合的逻辑进路是对应然层面法秩序的判定，而判定此种应然层面法秩序的必要前提则是对脱法实践以及相应的公司法强制性规范分别进行合法性评价。经过合法性评价后的脱法实践与公司法规则之间存在四种耦合形态，并可以类型化出三维逻辑样态： 正向评价的法与违法的脱法之竞争逻辑、负向评价的法与合法的脱法之替代逻辑以及负向评价的法与违法的脱法之重塑逻辑。不同逻辑样态下的变迁范式呈现出各异特征，并对公司法规则变迁产生不同程度的影响。 |
| 关键词: 法律规避 脱法行为 公司法制度变迁 合法评价 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“公司法程序规范优化路径研究”（项目编号： 21BFX097）、2020年教育部霍英东教育基金会项目“公司法制度变迁路径之检视与展望” |
|
| The Logic of Corporate Law's Evolution： Perspective of the Law Evasion |
|
Lin Shaowei
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The new round of corporate law revision has been launched, and it is undoubtedly significant to discuss and reflect on the evolution of corporate law rules from the macro level. As a kind of “dysfunctional autonomous behavior”, the practice of law evasion is closely related to the change of corporate law rules, and there is a basis for coupling, in which the two are unified in opposition and gradually opposed in unification. The logical progression of the coupling is to determine the substantive legal order, and the necessary prerequisite for determining the substantive legal order is to evaluate the legality of the practice of law evasion and the corresponding mandatory corporate law rules respectively. Generally, there are four types of coupling between the legality-evaluated decriminalization practice and the corporate law rules, which can be typified into three-dimensional logical patterns： the logic of competition between the positively evaluated law and the illegally decriminalized law, the logic of substitution between the negatively evaluated law and the legally decriminalized law, and the logic of reinvention between the negatively evaluated law and the illegally decriminalized law. The paradigms of evolution under different logical patterns show different characteristics and have different degrees of influence on the evolution of corporate law. |
| Key words: Legal Avoidance, Law Evasions, Corporate Law, Institutional Change, Legitimate Evaluation |
