• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:韩新远:个人行为轨迹信息的法律属性与分类保护研究,载《交大法学》2021年第3期,第69~79页。
Han Xinyuan, Research on the Legal Attribute and Classification Protection of the Individual Behavior Track Information,2021 (3) SJTU LAW REVIEW 69-79 (2021).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2880次   下载 2990次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
个人行为轨迹信息的法律属性与分类保护研究
韩新远1
华东政法大学法律学院
摘要:
在互联网与大数据时代,个人行为轨迹信息的价值得以彰显,成为一项重要的商业资源。应比照个人信息,对个人行为轨迹信息应否纳入法律评价和法律保护范围的问题进行探讨。可识别性是个人信息权益的逻辑基点,随着技术更迭和观念演进,识别实现了从身份到行为的扩展。通过考察识别标准,可梳理出个人行为轨迹信息从不可识别到可识别的流变。个人行为轨迹信息具有人格利益和财产利益,具备了成为受法律保护之权益或权利的条件。将个人行为轨迹信息纳入法律评价框架并不意味着要将其笼统落入个人信息的法律保护范围,而应平衡数据保护与数据自由之间的张力,构建本土化的分类保护模式,给予不同强度的保护措施。同时,应筑牢保护例外情形的原则底线。
关键词:  行为轨迹信息、个人信息、可识别、匿名信息、民法典
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色网络内容治理体系及监管模式研究”(项目编号: 18ZDA316)、2020年华东政法大学研究生创新项目“网络内容监管的法理研究”(项目编号: 20205037)
Research on the Legal Attribute and Classification Protection of the Individual Behavior Track Information
Han Xinyuan
Abstract:
In the age of the Internet and digital data, the value of personal behavior track information is highlighted and becomes an important commercial resource. To discuss whether the personal behavior track information should be included in the scope of legal evaluation and legal protection or not, the discussion should be carried out in the light of personal information. Identification is the logical basis of personal information interests. With the change of technology and the evolution of ideas, identification has realized the extension from the identity to the behavior. By examining the identification criteria, the evolution of the individual behavior track information from unrecognizability to identifiability can be sorted out. The personal behavior track information has both the personality interest and the property interest, and has the condition to be upgraded to the rights and interests protected by law. Integrating personal behavior track information into the legal evaluation framework does not mean that it should fall into the legal protection scope of personal information in general, but the tension between data protection and data freedom should be balanced; the localized classified protection mode should be constructed; protection measures with different intensities should be given. At the same time, the bottom line of protecting exceptional cases should be firmly established.
Key words:  Behavior Track Information, Personal Information, Identification, Anonymous Information, The Civil Code
您是本站第  4066815  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司