| 摘要: |
| 晚近四十年来，我国基于刑法“共同犯罪”一节展开的学术讨论，先后存在着以下四种范式： （1） “分工分类／作用分类”；（2） “限制的正犯概念／扩张的正犯概念”；（3） “区分制／单一制”；（4） “共同归责／单独归责”。立足于归责视角的讨论范式在出发点上相对合理，但在落脚点上对我国刑法“共同犯罪”节的体系归属产生“误判”。不论是从我国刑法第25条以下的规定还是从学说体系的缜密程度而言，采取单独归责模式（单一正犯体系）均能够为犯罪参与的认定提供更为坚实的基础。 |
| 关键词: 参与理论 讨论范式 共同犯罪 共犯从属性说 单一正犯体系 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Discussion Paradigm and the Conversion of the Criminal Participation Theory |
|
Li Ruijie
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| In the past forty years, our country's academic debate on the section of joint crimes in Chinese Criminal Law had the following four paradigms： A. “the division of contribution the division of role”; B. “the restrictive principle / the expansion principle”; C. “the differentiating system / the single system”; D. “the common imputation / the single imputation”. The latest paradigm from the perspective of imputation was relatively reasonable at the beginning, but its pioneers drew “a false conclusion” in the end. Whether it is from the section on joint crimes in Chinese Criminal Law or the degree of systematization of the single system, the mindset of single imputation （single system） can provide a more solid foundation for the identification of criminal participation. |
| Key words: Theory of Criminal Participation, Discussion Paradigm, Joint Crime, Theory of Accessorial Accomplice, Single System |
