• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:凌斌 季凡琳:低空经济的网络安全: 风险与治理,载《交大法学》2026年第1期,第75~88页。
Ling Bin & Ji Fanlin, Cybersecurity Risks and Regulatory Responses in Low Altitude Airspace Management, (1) SJTU LAW REVIEW 75-88 (2026).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1234次   下载 880次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
低空经济的网络安全: 风险与治理
凌斌 季凡琳1
北京大学法学院
摘要:
低空经济作为数字时代的新兴经济形态,高度依赖网络化、智能化基础设施,由此内生性地面临严峻且复杂的网络安全挑战,亟待系统研究。低空网络安全风险具有全链路覆盖、跨环节传导的系统性特征,可概括为涵盖“端—链—云—管”四个环节的风险结构。围绕不同国家在低空网络安全治理中的制度回应,本文提出并运用一个五维比较分析框架(RAISE),来刻画相关制度在多重治理目标之间的整体权衡。研究发现,各国虽在制造端前置安全责任、数据处理立法规范、通信链路工程化保障等方面呈现出共通结构,但在具体路径选择上,仍因国家安全关切、产业基础与治理传统的差异而形成显著分化。基于上述分析,本文认为,中国应立足自身产业条件与治理能力,在吸收国际共通经验的同时,探索符合国情的低空网络安全治理体系。
关键词:  低空经济 空域管理 低空网络安全 低空安全治理 无人机系统
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Cybersecurity Risks and Regulatory Responses in Low Altitude Airspace Management
Ling Bin & Ji Fanlin
Abstract:
As an emerging economic form in the digital era, the low-altitude economy relies heavily on networked and intelligent infrastructures, rendering it inherently exposed to severe and complex cybersecurity challenges that warrant systematic analysis. Cybersecurity risks in the low-altitude domain exhibit systemic characteristics of end-to-end coverage and cross-layer propagation, giving rise to a risk structure encompassing four interrelated segments: terminal, link, cloud, and management. Focusing on the institutional responses adopted by different countries in governing low-altitude cybersecurity, this paper proposes and applies a five-dimensional comparative analytical framework (RAISE) to examine how regulatory systems balance multiple governance objectives. The analysis reveals that, while countries display convergent structural approaches—such as the pre-positioning of security responsibilities at the manufacturing stage, the legalization of data processing rules, and the engineering of secure communication links—they diverge significantly in specific policy pathways due to differences in national security priorities, industrial foundations, and governance traditions. Based on these findings, the paper argues that China should, in light of its own industrial conditions and governance capacity, draw on shared international experience while developing a low-altitude cybersecurity governance framework suited to its national context.
Key words:  Low-altitude Economy, Airspace Governance, Low-altitude Cybersecurity, Low-altitude Safety Governance, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
您是本站第  5945246  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学慧谷科技楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司