| 摘要: |
| 近年来，数字平台越来越多地参与到公共任务执行之中，并基于技术架构、市场地位和信息等诸多因素具有类似于公权力的强势地位。在这一大背景下，公法介入平台治理的呼声越来越高。公法究竟如何介入平台治理，要结合诸多因素考量，是一项高度复杂的价值衡量和利益平衡作业，应视具体情况予以类型化处理。针对政府规制、元规制和自我规制这三种数字平台参与公共任务的形式，应分别采取直接适用、间接适用和参照适用这三种不同强度的公法介入模式。直接适用是指公法原则适用于约束数字平台，间接适用是指政府通过组织程序建构间接导入公法原则，参照适用则是指依靠数字平台企业自愿地参照公法原则进行自我约束。一直以来，传统行政法学是以公共行政为范式建构的公共行政法，对于探讨公法如何约束私主体的私行政法学则少有研究。应建构与公行政法学对应的私行政法学，为平台治理提供理论指引。而与此同时，平台治理又能够为建构私行政法反哺素材，两者生动体现了作为部门行政法的数字行政法学与行政法学总论之间彼此参照和相互促进的互动关系。 |
| 关键词: 平台治理 数字平台 私行政法学 数字行政法学 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:浙江省法学会重点课题“加快形成新质生产力的法治保障研究”（项目编号： 2024NA01） |
|
| How Does Public Law Intervene in Platform Governance? — Taking the Construction of Private Administrative Law as a Starting Point |
|
Liu Shaoyu
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| In recent years, digital platforms have increasingly participated in the execution of public tasks, acquiring a strong position akin to public power based on technological infrastructure, market status, and information, among other factors. Against this backdrop, there is a growing call for public law to intervene in platform governance. The intervention of public law in platform governance should be considered in conjunction with many factors; it is a highly complex task of value balancing and interest reconciliation, which should be typified according to specific circumstances. For the three forms of digital platform participation in public tasks — government regulation, meta-regulation, and self-regulation — three different intensities of public law intervention models should be adopted respectively: direct application, indirect application, and reference application. Direct application refers to the binding of digital platforms by public law principles, indirect application refers to the government indirectly importing public law principles through organizational procedures, and reference application refers to digital platform enterprises voluntarily self-restraining in accordance with public law principles. Traditional administrative law has been constructed based on public administration, while there has been little research on private administrative law that explores how public law can constrain private entities. It is necessary to construct a private administrative law corresponding to public administrative law to provide theoretical guidance for platform governance. At the same time, platform governance can also provide feedback material for the construction of private administrative law, vividly reflecting the interactive relationship between digital administrative law as a branch of administrative law and the general theory of administrative law, which refer to and promote each other. |
| Key words: Platform Governance, Digital Platforms, Private Administrative Law, Digital Administrative Law |
