| 摘要: |
| 当代对于大陆法系产生深远影响的法律评注兴起于德国。典型的法律评注作品根据法典的结构和顺序展开法律的逐条评释，以解释说明现行法及其适用为目的。与此不同，法学教科书以阐述法学基本原理为宗旨，侧重学术讨论；立法释义书以说明立法目的为主，但缺少司法裁判规则的整理和归纳。一部理想的法律评注，应当汇集和整合制定法、法学理论和司法裁判，体系地反映现行法的状况。法律评注与法教义学具有同构共生的关系，是法教义学的重要载体。法律评注比法教义学更加依赖实证法，当代编撰中国民法典评注的条件已经基本具备。编撰中国民法典评注应当融合法教义学与司法实务，注重体系思维与论题思维的互补。民法典评注的完成，将对我国民法教学事业和民法学术话语体系的建设起到至关重要的作用。在当今信息科技日新月异发展的时代，法律评注在专业分析、知识创新、价值判断等方面具有相对的优势，暂时不会被人工智能所取代。 |
| 关键词: 民法典 法律评注 法教义学 话语体系 法律科技 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Commentary on the Chinese Civil Code: Theoretical Foundations and Visionary Mission |
|
Zhu Xiaozhe
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The legal commentary, which has a profound impact on the continental law system, originated in Germany. A typical legal commentary unfolds a clause-by-clause interpretation of the law according to the structure and order of the code, aiming to explain and clarify the current law and its application. In contrast, legal textbooks aim to expound the basic principles of jurisprudence, and focus on academic discussion; legislative interpretation books mainly explain the purpose of legislation but lack the organization and synthesis of judicial rules. An ideal legal commentary should gather and integrate statutory law, legal theory, and judicial adjudication, and systematically reflect the status of the current law. Legal commentary and legal doctrine are interdependent and co-evolving, with the former serving as an important medium for the latter. Legal commentary relies more heavily on positive law and has limitations in terms of innovative viewpoints and theoretical breakthroughs. The conditions for compiling a commentary on China's Civil Code are essentially in place. Compiling a commentary on China's Civil Code should integrate legal dogmatics and judicial practice, emphasizing the complementarity of systematic thinking and topical thinking. The completion of the commentary on the Civil Code will play a crucial role in the development of civil law teaching in our country and the construction of the civil law academic discourse system. In today's era of rapidly evolving information technology, legal commentary has relative advantages in professional analysis, knowledge innovation, and value judgment and will not be replaced by artificial intelligence in the near future. |
| Key words: Civil Code, Legal Commentary, Legal Dogmatics, Discourse System, Legal Technology |
