• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:范奇:双向诉讼抑或单向诉讼?——行政协议诉讼的模式选择,载《交大法学》2024年第3期,第115~128页。
Fan Qi, Bilateral Litigation or One-Way Litigation?—The Model Selection of Administrative Agreement Litigation, (3) SJTU LAW REVIEW 115-128 (2024).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 858次   下载 465次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
双向诉讼抑或单向诉讼?——行政协议诉讼的模式选择
范奇1
西南大学教师教育学院
摘要:
我国行政协议诉讼制度确立后,面临着解决行政协议内在的“双向”结构冲突与融合的问题。部分学者主张借鉴德式经验,构建整体双向诉讼制度,但这种诉讼结构与我国目前的行政诉讼结构存在冲突。从行政协议制度创设的路径模式上看,德国倾向于主观模式,法国则倾向于客观模式,主张借鉴德式经验实际也会与我国大量借鉴法国行政协议进行制度创设的事实相冲突。同时双向诉讼制度还会与我国行政诉讼的客观诉讼定位有所抵牾,以及存在“外源制约”等四个方面的困境。基于此,暂不宜将双向诉讼制度直接移植入法。可取的路径是,进一步完善我国的单向行政协议诉讼制度。我国已有的制度具有兼容性,能够对行政协议的合约审查和强制执行机制进行吸收与调试,利用行政协议判例的累积构建公法合同规则体系。
关键词:  行政协议诉讼 创制 路径模式 双向诉讼 客观诉讼
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:重庆市社会科学规划博士项目“比较法视域下国外师德失范处理的法治构造与借鉴研究”(项目编号: 2023BS092)、重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目“行政法视野下中国高校教师聘任改革的理论与制度研究”(项目编号: 2022YC073)
Bilateral Litigation or One-Way Litigation?—The Model Selection of Administrative Agreement Litigation
Fan Qi
Abstract:
After the establishment of China's administrative agreement litigation system, it is facing the problem of resolving the inherent “two-way” structural conflicts and integration of administrative agreements. Some scholars advocate drawing on the German experience to construct a comprehensive two-way litigation system, but this litigation structure conflicts with China's current administrative litigation structure. From the perspective of the path model for the establishment of the administrative agreement system, Germany tends to adopt a subjective model, while France tends to adopt an objective model. Advocating to draw on German experience actually conflicts with the fact that China extensively draws on French administrative agreements for system creation. At the same time, the two-way litigation system will also contradict the objective litigation positioning of administrative litigation in China, and there are four difficulties such as “external constraints”. Based on this, it is currently not appropriate to directly transplant the two-way litigation system into law. The recommended path is to further improve China's one-way administrative agreement litigation system. The existing system in China is compatible and can absorb and debug the contract review and compulsory execution mechanism of administrative agreements. By utilizing the accumulation of administrative agreement precedents, a system of public law contract rules can be constructed.
Key words:  Administrative Agreement Litigation, Creation, Path Mode, Bilateral litigation,Objective Litigation
您是本站第  4087948  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司