| 摘要: |
| 遗赠是否违背公序良俗应以遗赠本身为审查对象，而不能以遗赠以外之事实为断。同时，情人遗赠行为是否违背公序良俗，尤应考察当事人一方遗赠的动机是否是将性奉献与经济上的对待给付联结起来，抑或是存在其他更值得尊重的动机。但在私法视角下，情人遗赠的效力，总是呈现出完全有效或完全无效的形态。而在基本权利冲突与权衡的视角下，各基本权利相互较量各自在具体个案中的分量，此种权衡和较量之结果体现在法律行为效力上，即既非完全有效亦非完全无效，而是在两者间存在多种可能性，因而更能适应个案中的具体情况，也更具灵活性。 |
| 关键词: 公序良俗 遗赠 基本权利 遗嘱自由 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“民法典继承编与其他各编的制度协调和规则契合研究”（项目编号： 18BFX111） |
|
| The Application of Public Order and Good Morals in Lover's Legacy Dispute—From the Dual Perspective Based on Private Law and Fundamental Rights Conflicts Theory |
|
Liu Yaodong
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Whether the legacy is contrary to public order and good morals shall be judged by taking the legacy itself as the object of review, not by the facts beyond the legacy. Meanwhile, whether the act of a lovers legacy is contrary to public order and good morals shall be judged especially by examining whether the motive of the party making the legacy is to connect the sexual devotion with the economic exchange performing, or whether there are any other more respectable motives. However, the effect of a lover's legacy is always presented in the form of completely valid or completely invalid from the perspective of private law. While from the perspective of conflicts and balance of fundamental rights, each fundamental right competes for its own weight in specific cases, and the result of this kind of balance and contest is reflected in the effect of the legal act, which is neither completely valid nor completely invalid, but there are a variety of possibilities between the two. It is therefore more adaptable and flexible to the specific circumstances of individual cases. |
| Key words: Public Order and Good Morals, Legacy, Fundamental Rights, Freedom of Testament |
