| 摘要: |
| 示意图、实物模型、计算机模拟品等“辅助说明材料”常见于近年的法庭审判之中，这些特殊的诉讼材料对案件事实不具证明力，仅有解释、说明功能。我国学者受美国证据理论影响将此类材料通称为“示意证据”： 或是将其与“示意证据”直接等同；或是将其视为“示意证据”的特定种类。但辅助说明功能不等于示意功能，不能将辅助说明材料等于示意材料；此类材料也非证据，冠以“示意证据”之名不符合现行法。应当在我国的证据法体系中赋予辅助说明材料以独立地位，并根据我国法律的特点构建相应的法庭运用规则。 |
| 关键词: 示意证据 辅助说明材料 证据法体系 法定证据种类 法庭调查程序 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Illustrative Aids： The Role in the Law and the Rule on the Court |
|
Zhou Junyan
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Recent years, “illustrative aids” such as diagrams, physical models, computer generated simulations are really common in trials. These special materials have no substantive value, but only the function of illustration and explanation. Under the influence of American theory, Chinese scholars just call this kind of material as “demonstrative evidence”, either directly equate it with “demonstrative evidence”, or regard it as a specific kind of “demonstrative evidence”. However, the function of illustration is not equal to the function of demonstration, so the illustrative aids cannot be equal to the demonstrative material; moreover, such aids are not evidence, so the title of “demonstrative evidence” does not conform to the law. We should comprehend illustrative aids as an independent law concept in our legal system of evidence, and construct the rules of using according to the characteristics of the law of our country, including the rules of proposing, investigating and evaluating. |
| Key words: Demonstrative Evidence, Illustrative Aids, Legal System of Evidence, Types of Legal Evidence, Court Investigation Procedure |
