| 摘要: |
| 财产犯中的财产性利益本质上是法律赋予公民的特定权利，从事实特征出发不能对财产性利益予以精准界定。作为财产犯罪对象的财产性利益应当限于民法典“合同编”所规定的原权之债，其包括原权性意定之债（合同之债）与具有准合同性质的原权性法定之债（不当得利、无因管理之债）。财物与财产性利益的权利属性与调整对象呈现出平行态势，即“财物—人与物—支配权—物权法”与“财产性利益—人与人—请求权—债法”。物的返还请求权作为民法典“物权编”规定的救济之债，不属于财产性利益；民法典“婚姻家庭编”与“继承编”规定的抚养请求权、赡养请求权以及继承权等原权性法定之债，不属于财产性利益。 |
| 关键词: 财产性利益 财物 民法典合同编 原权之债 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| On the Property Interests of Property Crimes |
|
Li Hong & Chen Shaoqing
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Property interests among property crimes are essentially specific rights granted to citizens by law， and property interests cannot be accurately defined from the perspective of factual characteristics． Property interests that are the object of property crimes shall be limited to the debts of the original right stipulated in the “Contract Part” of the Civil Code， which include the contractual debts and the statutory debts with the nature of the quasi contract （Unjust enrichment and Negotiorum gestio）． The attributes of rights and adjustment objects of property and property interests show a parallel trend， namely， “property people and objects right to control real law” and “property interest people to people right to claim debt law”． The restitution is a debt of relief under the “Property Rights Part” of the Civil Code， and is not a property interest． The original statutory debts such as custody rights， support rights， and succession rights stipulated in the “Marriage and Family Part” and the “Succession Part” of the Civil Code are not property interests． |
| Key words: Property Interests, Property, Contracts Part of the Civil Code, Debts of the Original Right |
