• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:方芳:保护作品完整权的侵权判断标准,载《交大法学》2022年第2期,第130~147页。
Fang Fang, Criteria of Infringement of the Right to Integrity,2022 (2) SJTU LAW REVIEW 130-147 (2022).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2438次   下载 2560次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
保护作品完整权的侵权判断标准
方芳1
清华大学法学院
摘要:
保护作品完整权的侵权判断标准分为有违作品的思想和有损作者的声誉两种。我国著作权法移植作者权体系的二元论模式,但司法实践突破立法引入了版权体系的声誉标准,争议的实质是如何平衡作者和作品利用方的利益。伯尔尼公约就两大法系的差异没有实质性作为,但在原则性的框架下提供有限度的保护已经成为比较法上的共识。建议否弃声誉标准,确立作品思想标准加合理限度内的改动作为侵权例外的模式。通过作品符号的结构化解析划分核心表达要素和非核心表达要素,作品的思想可以简化为对核心表达要素及其相互关系的判断,为侵权判定提供参考。
关键词:  保护作品完整权 作品思想标准 作者声誉标准 利益平衡 符号能指和所指
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Criteria of Infringement of the Right to Integrity
Fang Fang
Abstract:
There are two criteria of infringement of the right to integrity: criterion of the idea of works, and criterion of the reputation of authors. Chinese Copyright Law transplanted the dualism model of the authors rights system, but whose judicial practice broke through the provisions of legislation and introduced the reputation criterion of the copyright system. The essence of the disputes between the two criteria is how to balance the interests of the author and the user of the work. The Berne Convention has no substantive construction on the differences between the two systems, but it has become a consensus in comparative law to provide limited protection under the principled framework. It is recommended that criterion of the reputation of authors should be abandoned, and the mode of criterion of the idea of works plus necessary changes within reasonable limits as an exception should be adopted. Through the structured analysis of the symbol of the work, the core expression elements and non core expression elements are divided. Thus, the idea of the work can be simplified to judge the core expression elements and its interrelationships, which can be a reference for the judgement of infringement of the right to integrity.
Key words:  The Right to Integrity, Criterion of the Idea of Works, Criterion of the Reputation of Authors, Balance of Interests, Signifiers and Referents
您是本站第  4224714  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司