• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:张青波:行政组织法视角下环境标准制度的反思与完善,载《交大法学》2022年第2期,第86~98页。
Zhang Qingbo, Reflection and Improvement of Environmental Standard System in China,2022 (2) SJTU LAW REVIEW 86-98 (2022).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1726次   下载 1181次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
行政组织法视角下环境标准制度的反思与完善
张青波1
中南财经政法大学法学院
摘要:
我国环境标准制度的症结是自我规制理念的缺失。德国法带来的启示是强化由半官方的中间组织主导环境标准的制修订工作。因而,在行政组织法和程序法上,应实现由标准化技术委员会或专家组承担起草审查工作、以公众理性制衡专家理性、保障决策者的中立性、促成公众积极参与并确立政府对程序的监督。如此改革后,环境标准虽不是国家法规范,但仍可对环境执法和司法审判发挥一定指引作用。
关键词:  环境标准 自我规制 中间组织 风险规制
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金“新时代海洋强国建设”重大研究专项(项目编号: 20VHQ005)和南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)资助项目(项目编号: SML2020SP005)
Reflection and Improvement of Environmental Standard System in China
Zhang Qingbo
Abstract:
The crux of China’s environmental standard system is the lack of self regulation concept. The enlightenment of German law is to strengthen the formulation and revision of environmental standards led by semi official intermediary organizations. Therefore, in terms of administrative organization law and procedural law, Standardization Technical Committee or expert group should be responsible for drafting and reviewing work, it should be a balance between expert rationality and public rationality, the neutrality of decision makers should be ensured, and the supervision by the government over the enacting procedures should be established as well. After such reform, environmental standards are not regulations or normative documents, but can still be used as the yardstick of environmental law enforcement and judicial trial.
Key words:  Environmental Standards, Self regulation, Intermediate Organization, Risk Regulation
您是本站第  4224604  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司