| 摘要: |
| 在社会热切的期待中，2017年修订的《反不正当竞争法》增加了“互联网专条”。意外的是，该条文一出台就出现失灵： 大量案件拒绝具体规则的涵摄，纷纷向一般条款逃逸。“互联网专条”是法律组织技术的知识反映，规则失灵源于方法上的深刻危机。该条文经不起教义法学上的概念分析，缺乏术语、内涵模糊、外延边界不清。“互联网专条”是概念思维指导下的所谓类型化，难以建立严格意义上的类型。形式主义是有限度的，《反不正当竞争法》的法律实践和理论研究需要一种问题转向，寻求保障经验知识习得和累积的强大方法。关键词 |
| 关键词: 互联网专条，法律形式主义规则失灵概念思维类型思维 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Methodological Crisis of the Techniques of Legislation： Rethinking about the Internet Article |
|
Xie Xiaoyao
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Responding to the eager expectation of the society, the Anti Unfair Competition Law revised in 2017 added the Internet Article. Surprisingly, this Article failed as soon as it was introduced： a large number of cases refused to be subsumed within the specific clauses articulated by it, but fled to the general clause. The Internet Article is an intellectual reflection of the techniques of organizing legal texts. The failure of this Article results from a deep methodological crisis. The Article cannot withstand doctrinal conceptual analysis, with few terms, ambiguous connotations, and unclear extension. As a so called “typification” under the guidance of conceptual thinking, the Internet Article can hardly establish any type in the strict sense. Legal Formalism has its limitation. The legal practice and theoretical research of Anti Unfair Competition Law ask for a turning of issues, and seek for a powerful methodology in assuring the acquisition and accumulation of empirical knowledge. |
| Key words: The Internet Article, Legal Formalism, Failure of Rules, Conceptual Thinking, Typified Thinking |
