| 摘要: |
| 最高人民法院出台的有关反不正当竞争法与知识产权法关系的司法政策可化约为一项法律规则，授权法院在一定条件下援引反不正当竞争法为知识产权提供附加保护。这项政策的适用难点在于其适用条件。该政策的一阶适用条件为，知识产权法未予禁止的情形构成法律漏洞并且立法者未禁止法院填补漏洞。可是，存在一些阻却漏洞认定或填补的知识产权法律规则。只有为阻却漏洞认定或填补的规则设立例外，一阶适用条件才能成立。而为阻却漏洞认定或填补的规则设立例外以法院拥有对这些规则的续造权为前提。法院的续造权因此构成二阶适用条件。按我国国家机构权力配置的标准，法院应享有续造权。法院行使续造权应受论证负担规则的限制。 |
| 关键词: 司法政策 法律漏洞 法律续造权 功能主义 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| On Elaboration of Legal Dogmatics of the Judicial Policy on the Relationship Between the Anti Unfair Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law |
|
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The judicial policy of the Supreme People's Court on the relationship between the anti unfair competition law and intellectual property law can be reduced to a legal rule which authorizes the courts to invoke the anti unfair competition law to provide additional protection for intellectual property rights under certain conditions. The difficulty in applying this rule lies in its application conditions. The first order condition of this policy is that the conditions not prohibited by intellectual property law constitute gaps in the law， and the legislator does not prohibit the courts from filling the gaps. However， there are rules in intellectual property law that prevent the identification or filling of gaps. The first order condition can only be met if the exceptions are established for the rules to prevent the identification or filling of the gaps. However， the exceptions presuppose that the courts shall own the legal renewal power regarding these rules. The courts' renewal power thus constitutes the second order condition. According to the standard of power allocation among our state institutions， courts should own the renewal power. Courts' exercise of this renewal power should be limited by the rule of the burden of proof. |
| Key words: Judicial Policy, Gaps in the Law, Legal Renewal Power, Functionalism |
