• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:林彦:信用惩戒制度对行政法治秩序的结构性影响,载《交大法学》2020年第4期,第86~96页。
, The Social Credit and Punishment System's Structural Impacts on the Administrative Legal Framework,2020 (4) SJTU LAW REVIEW 86-96 (2020).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3024次   下载 1344次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
信用惩戒制度对行政法治秩序的结构性影响
林彦1
上海交通大学凯原法学院
摘要:
传统管制手段不断式微、民间自发生长的信用维系体系尚未形成、网络诈骗及“执行难”等管理难题的存在,以及公民信息收集的便捷化等,促成了信用惩戒制度的产生。与以市场逻辑和社会自治为基础的征信制度不同,信用惩戒本质上是一种政府管理制度,而非市场机制,具有明显的国家干预色彩。信用惩戒制度已经对我国行政法治秩序,尤其对违反行政法上义务行为的控制方式、相对人承担行政法律责任的方式、行政机关行使职权的方式等均产生了结构性的深刻影响,分别产生了混同、替代和屏蔽的效果。这些变化也使依法行政原则的坚守以及行政相对人权益的保障面临前所未有的挑战。
关键词:  信用惩戒制度 结构性影响 混同 替代 屏蔽
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
The Social Credit and Punishment System's Structural Impacts on the Administrative Legal Framework
Abstract:
The establishment of the social credit and punishment system is attributable to the following factors: the waning of the traditional regulatory tools, the lack of a comprehensive market oriented credit system, the widespread on line fraud cases, the difficulties of enforcing judicial judgments, and the growing convenience of collecting personal information. Unlike the market based credit system, the social credit and punishment system is in essence a governmental regulatory mechanism. Such a system has already generated structural impacts on China's administrative legal system, especially on the foundation and logic of punishing citizens under the administrative law, and on the ways of carrying out duties by governmental officials. Messing up, substitution, and shielding are three main impacts, which will further pose challenges to safeguarding the rule of law principle and protecting citizens' rights.
Key words:  The Social Credit and Punishment System, Structural Impacts, Messing-up, Substitution, Shielding
您是本站第  4224779  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司