| 摘要: |
| 信托受托人忠实义务中受益人利益地位存在单一主义与衡量主义之不同立场，受托人在利益冲突交易与获利上是绝对禁止还是一般限制例外允许是二者的本质区别。单一主义适应民事信托中之无偿管理本质，而衡量主义则适应商业信托运行的客观要求。为此，应在区分信托的民商事属性的基础上去解释适用《信托法》第25条，在民事信托中采用限缩立场，回归利益冲突交易禁止与获利禁止的立场；解释《证券投资基金法》第18条的含义，明确引入信托合同约定例外、披露加受益人同意例外之例外；同时，《信托法》《证券投资基金法》及其他监管文件也应作相应修改。 |
| 关键词: 信托法 商业信托 民事信托 信托义务 受益人利益 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| An Interpretation on Beneficiary's Interests in Trustees' Duty of Fidelity： Monoscientism vs. Measurementism |
|
Cao Xingquan
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The Triple Authorization Principle, which was first raised in Sina Weibo v. Maimai, requires three authorization before a data collector collects data from a data holder： the Internet user's authorization to data holder, the Internet user's authorization to the data collector, and the data holder's authorization to the data collector. This principle should not be applied to all kinds of data. The basic rules of data collection among companies should be decided by the category of data： in the case of collecting identifiable and original data, the Internet user's rather than the data holder's consent is required; when collecting unidentifiable and derived data, the data holder's rather than the Internet user's consent is required; when it encounters to identifiable and derived data, both the Internet user and the data holder's consent are required; as for the unidentifiable and original data, the Internet user's consent is not required, and the data holder's consent is mandatory or not depends on whether the data is publicly available. |
| Key words: Fiduciary Duty of The Trustee, Principle of Best Interest for The Beneficiary, Prohibition of Conflict of Interest, Prohibition of Profiting |
