| 摘要: |
| 随着我国本土版权产业的发展，特别是在与互联网产业和人工智能产业先后融合后，著作权制度既与域外同步面临新技术的冲击，也因产业特色的差异而呈现不同的调整路径。但在前沿问题的解读和应对上，我国存在将技术上的新概念等同于法律上的新问题，以及在没有穷尽既有规则文义的前提下创设新规则的方法论偏见，不但引发了著作权制度体系的混乱，也影响了规则解释的稳定性。为了实现法律适用的平等性要求，有必要坚持从法律效果而非技术效果的角度来分辨前沿问题，并回归对现行规范的文义加以补充、扩张、限缩或改造来对不确定概念进行具体化和价值填充。特别是在我国著作权法修订频率较低的情况下，利用对关联性判例进行体系化解释和通说塑造，显然是比直接引入新概念或者新规则更为可行的路径。 |
| 关键词: 人工智能生成内容 用户生成内容 二次创作 游戏规则 著作权 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Addressing Emerging Debates in China's Copyright Law |
|
Xiong Qi
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| With the development of China's domestic copyright industries， especially through the sequential integration with the internet and artificial intelligence industries， the copyright legal system has not only simultaneously faced technological challenges alongside with foreign counterparts but has also generated distinct interpretive approaches due to different industry-specific characteristics. However， in the interpretation and response to cutting-edge issues， China tends to equate new technical concepts with new legal problems and create new rules without exhausting the literal meaning of existing rules. These practices have resulted in institutional confusion within the copyright framework and undermined the interpretative stability of legal norms. To fulfill the principle of equality in legal application， it is necessary to distinguish cutting-edge issues from the perspective of legal effects rather than technological impacts， and to resolve conceptual ambiguities through supplementation， expansion， restriction， or modification of the textual interpretations of existing rules. Especially given the relatively low frequency of amendments to China's Copyright Law， utilizing systematic interpretation and consensus-building through related jurisprudence is clearly a more feasible path than directly introducing new concepts or new rules. |
| Key words: AI-generated Content, User-generated Content, Secondary Creation, Game Rules, Copyright |
