• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:陈洪杰:纠纷治理如何稳定法律预期——新时代“枫桥经验”的法治化原理,载《交大法学》2025年第5期,第30~43页。
Chen Hongjie, How to Stabilize Legal Expectations in Dispute Governance — The Rule of Law Principle of the “Fengqiao Experience” in the New Era, (5) SJTU LAW REVIEW 30-43 (2025).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 169次   下载 175次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
纠纷治理如何稳定法律预期——新时代“枫桥经验”的法治化原理
陈洪杰1
上海政法学院上海司法研究所、上海市人民检察院第一分院研究室
摘要:
以新时代“枫桥经验”为代表的社会治理模式正在尝试进行更为多元的实践探索和转型,通过引导社会力量参与治理,构建多元主体协同共治体系。借助经典法社会学案例“卡迪的第十二头骆驼”的隐喻表达,法社会学家试图提供一个关于国家治理或是纠纷治理的新思路,那就是通过主动“借给”社会一头“骆驼”,努力超越参与博弈者通常采取的压倒一方或者取代一方的非合作策略,让原本零和的非合作博弈有可能转化成正和的合作博弈。从“卡迪的骆驼”所执行的象征功能来看,在合作博弈的策略背景中,司法所能调用的最为重要的象征资源就是“预期”本身,正是通过“对预期的预期”这一象征媒介,博弈的各方参与者才有可能在执行合作策略的过程中,让作为象征资源的“预期”获得再生产。司法所象征的公共权力体制才有可能通过“借给”社会一头“骆驼”而获得合作剩余。
关键词:  习近平法治思想  规范性预期  正和博弈  协同治理  枫桥式人民法庭
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“广泛信任与具体信任相统一的司法认同机制研究”(项目编号: 23BFX133)
How to Stabilize Legal Expectations in Dispute Governance — The Rule of Law Principle of the “Fengqiao Experience” in the New Era
Chen Hongjie
Abstract:
Our social governance model, represented by the “Fengqiao Experience” in the new era, is attempting to explore and transform more diverse practices, by leading social forces to participate in governance and building a multi-party cooperative governance system. Using the metaphorical expression of the classic case of legal sociology, “Qadi's twelfth camel”, legal sociologists attempt to provide a new approach to national governance or dispute governance, that is, by actively “lending” a “camel” to society, they strive to surpass the non-cooperative strategies commonly adopted by game participants to overwhelm or replace one party, make it possible for a non-cooperative game that was originally zero sum to transform into a cooperative game that is positive sum (i.e. win-win or multi win).From the perspective of the symbolic function performed by “Qadi's Camel”, in the strategic context of cooperative games, the most important symbolic resource that the judiciary can invoke is the “expectation” itself. It is through the symbolic medium of “expectation of expectation” that all participants in the game are able to reproduce the “expectation” as a symbolic resource in the process of implementing cooperative strategies. The public power system, symbolized by the judiciary, is likely to obtain surplus cooperation through “lending” a “camel” to society.
Key words:  Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law, Normative Expectations, Positive Sum Game, Collaborative Governance, Fengqiao Style Court
您是本站第  4666699  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司