| 摘要: |
| 《个人信息保护法》实施已近四周年，其是否真正实现了“保护个人信息权益、促进信息合理使用”的立法目的，有必要从司法实践层面进行全面考察。通过对比《个人信息保护法》出台前后五年期间的331件个人信息相关案例，可以看到该法虽然有效提升了个人信息的司法救济水平，但在法律适用中仍然面临着相关难题，主要表现为隐私权与个人信息保护规则间的适用关系不明、私密信息认定标准不一、过错归责原则适用冲突等问题。在理论上，有必要进一步明确《个人信息保护法》的适用前提，重构私密信息的判断标准，类型化适用个人信息侵权救济规则。 |
| 关键词: 个人信息 隐私权 私密信息 过错推定 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“民法典中隐私权与个人信息的协同保护研究”（项目编号： 21CFX034） |
|
| Judicial Dilemmas and Regulatory Responses in the Protection of Personal Information in China — An Empirical Study Based on 331 Cases Involving Personal Information |
|
Jin Yao
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Nearly four years have passed since the implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). To assess whether it has truly achieved its legislative goals — “protecting personal information rights and promoting the reasonable use of information” — a comprehensive review from the perspective of judicial practice is necessary. By comparing 331 personal information-related cases from the five years before and after the enactment of the PIPL, it is evident that while the law has significantly enhanced the level of judicial relief for personal information, there are still prominent issues in its application. These include ambiguous relationships between the right to privacy and personal information protection rules, inconsistent standards for identifying private information, and conflicts in the application of the presumption of fault principle. Theoretically, it is essential to further clarify the preconditions for applying the PIPL, reconstruct the criteria for identifying private information, and develop typified rules for personal information infringement remedies. |
| Key words: Personal Information, Right to Privacy, Private Information, Presumption of Fault |
