• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:张杰:论司法公共表达与“网库并行”案例发布模式的建构,载《交大法学》2025年第1期,第68~85页。
Zhang jie, On the Public Expression of Judiciary and the Establish of “Parallel Online Database” Cases, (1) SJTU LAW REVIEW 68-85 (2025).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 556次   下载 167次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
论司法公共表达与“网库并行”案例发布模式的建构
张杰1
中南大学法学院、国家人权教育与培训基地中南大学人权研究中心
摘要:
司法公共表达是司法公开内容质效的提升,也与法律沟通存在区别。案例是司法公共表达的重要载体。一国案例发布模式应当根据法域特征、法治传统以及民众心理等综合选择,并契合司法公共表达效果予以优化。我国应当采取上级司法机关审核后选择性公开的方式发布案例。当前我国形成了“中国裁判文书网”发布文书案例和“人民法院案例库”收录典型案例的“网库并行”案例发布模式。以司法公共表达为视域,应当建构案例审核筛选、信息过滤、炒作规避、数据安全等机制,未来还应加强案例发布的立法保障和技术安全,强化案例发布形式内容的优化,在更高层面统筹建设“司法案例库”,实现更大范围公开案例,推进案例发布在司法公共表达中发挥更大作用。
关键词:  司法公共表达 司法案例 “网库并行” 人民法院案例库 中国裁判文书网
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:2024年度教育部国家人权教育与培训基地重大项目“大数据司法权力运用与人权保障界域研究”(项目编号: 24JJD820014)及2024年度中南大学“高端智库”项目“数字经济发展的法治保障问题研究”(项目编号: 2024znzk04)
On the Public Expression of Judiciary and the Establish of “Parallel Online Database” Cases
Zhang jie
Abstract:
Judicial public expression is the improvement of the quality and effectiveness of judicial public content, which is also different from legal communication. Cases are important carriers of judicial public expression. The mode of case release in a country should be comprehensively selected based on the characteristics of the legal domain, the tradition of the rule of law, and the psychology of the public, and optimized in line with the effectiveness of judicial public expression. China should adopt the method of selective release of cases after review by higher-level judicial authorities. At present, China has formed a “parallel network database” case publishing mode, where the “China Judgments Document Network” publishes document cases and the “People's Court Case Database” collects typical cases. From the perspective of judicial public expression, mechanisms such as case review and screening, information filtering, hype avoidance, and data security should be established. In the future, legislative guarantees and technical security for case publication should be strengthened, and the optimization of case publication forms and contents should be enhanced. At a higher level, a “judicial case library” should be comprehensively constructed to achieve a wider range of public cases and promote the greater role of case publication in judicial public expression.
Key words:  Judicial Public Expression, Judicial Cases, “Parallel Network Database”, People's Court Case Library, China Judgment Document Network
您是本站第  4223673  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司