| 摘要: |
| 审判对象论是检验刑事诉讼模式的试金石。我国刑事诉讼法所确立的审判对象论既未采用诉因对象说也未严格贯彻公诉事实说，但诉因制度所承担的审判对象划定功能和防御功能不仅有刑事诉讼法上的法条根据，而且在实务中也有被认可的趋势。从诉因的基本功能出发限制我国公诉变更范围具有必要性和可行性。属于诉因范围内的必要事项发生变动或者对被告人的防御具有重要意义的事项发生变更时，原则上应变更公诉。然而，公诉的变更受制于公诉事实同一性，在同一性的判断上，应尊重共同的事实基础，并且不得超越被告人的防御范围。 |
| 关键词: 审判对象 诉因 防御权 公诉变更 公诉事实同一性 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| On the Necessity and Possible Limitations of Changes in Public Prosecution |
|
Li Shiyang
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The theory of trial object is the touchstone to test the mode of criminal procedure. The object of trial theory in our country's criminal procedure law does not adopt either the cause of action theory or strictly the fact of public prosecution theory. However, the function of the object of trial delineation and defense undertaken by the cause of action system is not only based on the law of criminal procedure law, but also tends to be recognized in practice. It is both necessary and feasible to limit the scope of changes to the public prosecution from the basic function of the cause of action. In principle, the public prosecution should be changed, if essential matters within the scope of the cause of action are changed or if the matters of great significance to the defense of the defendant are changed. However, the change of public prosecution is subject to the identity of the public prosecution facts, and the judgment of identity should respect the common factual basis, and should not exceed the scope of defense of the defendant. |
| Key words: Trial Object, Cause of Action, The Right to Defense, Change of Public Prosecution, Identity of Facts in Public Prosecution |
