| 摘要: |
| 当前的著作权兜底条款存在学理定位不清与适用机理不明的问题。解决此问题，首先需要廓清权利法定原则在知识产权法中的本来面目。知识产权法定应作设权原则来理解，而非功利主义权利观的替代表述，其规范目的在于证立知识产权的绝对权属性。著作权亦须遵循知识产权法定原则，具体包括权利类型法定和权利内容法定。以规范目的为评价标准，著作权兜底条款不违背知识产权法定。在规范适用方面，著作权兜底条款是隐藏的法律漏洞，需根据规范目的限缩法条文义后适用。在法院援引兜底条款为裁判依据时，需从规范的适用条件、解释路径及适用效果等方面来综合判定。 |
| 关键词: 著作权兜底条款 知识产权法定 物权法定 法律漏洞 目的性限缩 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| On the Application of the Copyright Cave Clause: From the Perspective of Numerus Clausus of Property |
|
Bai Ruicheng
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The academic orientation and application mechanism of copyright cave clause are unclear. To solve this problem, it is necessary to clarify the original features of the numerus clausus of rights in intellectual property law. The numerus clausus of rights in intellectual property law should be understood as the principle of establishing rights, rather than the alternative expression of the utilitarian view of rights, and its purpose is to realize the absoluteness of rights through the demonstration of rights. Copyright also follows this principle, which includes legal right type and legal content. In accordance with the normative purpose, the copyright cave clause does not violate the numerus clausus of intellectual property. In terms of legal method, the copyright cave clause is a hidden legal loophole that the court needs to invoke it through purposive limitation. The reasonable interpretation of “shall be enjoyed by the right holder” in the clause is “can be publicized in a certain form”. In juridical practice, the court should not only confirm the existence of the legal loophole, but also consider the possible impact of the application of the copyright cave clause from the perspective of consequences. |
| Key words: Copyright Cave Clause, Numerus Clausus of Intellectual Property, Publication of Right, Hidden Legal Loophole, Purposive Limitation |
