| 摘要: |
| 检察机关已初步形成了认罪认罚案件办案质效的评价指标体系，各评价指标呈现出“多维性”“侧重性”“灵活性”“差异性”等特点。但每一个主要评价指标在实现其预期功用的同时也都有一定的盲区和局限。而且，评估中还存在“重自我评估，轻外部评估”“重结果评估，轻过程评估”“重专用评估，轻通用评估”“重经验总结，轻问题归纳”及“重定量评估，轻定性评估”等问题。鉴于此，有必要从导向、主体、方式、内容、效力、时机等方面优化评估路径，并围绕质量、效率、效果三大维度构建多元融合的质效评估指标体系。 |
| 关键词: 认罪认罚 质效评估 局限 评估指标 机制完善 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度实施问题研究”（项目编号： 19AFX009）、最高人民检察院2022年度检察理论研究课题“认罪认罚案件质效的评估与保障研究”（项目编号： GJ2022D09）和重庆市社会科学规划课题“认罪认罚案件抗诉标准研究”（项目编号： 2021NDYB026） |
|
| Reflection and Perfection of the Quality effectiveness Evaluation Mechanism of the Case of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty |
|
Yan Zhaohua
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The procuratorial organs have initially formed an evaluation index system for the quality and effectiveness of handling cases of pleading guilty and accepting penalty， and each evaluation index shows the characteristics of “multi-dimensional”， “emphasis”， “flexibility” and “difference”. However， each main evaluation indicator has certain blind spots and limitations while achieving its expected function. In addition， there are still problems in the evaluation， such as “valuing self-evaluation， neglecting external evaluation”， “valuing result evaluation， neglecting process evaluation”， “valuing special evaluation， neglecting general evaluation”， “valuing experience summary， neglecting problem induction” and “valuing quantitative evaluation， neglecting qualitative evaluation”. In view of this， it is necessary to optimize the evaluation path from the aspects of orientation， subject， method， content， effectiveness and timing， and build a multiple and integrated evaluation index system around the three dimensions of quality， efficiency and effectiveness. |
| Key words: Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty, Quality Effectiveness Evaluation, Limitation, Evaluation Indicators, Perfect Mechanism |
