| 摘要: |
| 禁诉令指一国司法机关裁定一方当事人不得到其他国家提起诉讼、申请执行其他国家司法判决或寻求其他公权力救济，否则追究该当事人责任的命令。标准必要专利纠纷涉及请求停止侵权救济、请求确定全球/一国FRAND费率等，当事人多在多个国家提起诉讼，容易引起裁判冲突。我国可合理改造行为保全制度以决定是否颁发禁诉令，分三层次考虑： 本法域诉讼与域外诉讼标的是否相同或相关；将“难以弥补的损失”或“使裁判难以执行”理解为评估域外诉讼对本法域诉讼公平展开与执行的影响，考量利益平衡是否倾向申请人；考量对礼让原则的影响是否达到其他法域不能容忍的程度。 |
| 关键词: 标准必要专利 行为保全 初步禁令 禁诉令 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Study on Anti-Suit Injunction in Standard Essential Patent Dispute |
|
Tan Yuhang
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| “Anti-suit injunction” refers to a country's Judiciary rules that a party cannot file a lawsuit in other countries or apply for the execution of other jurisdictions' judgment or seek other relieves, otherwise punish the party. The standard essential patent dispute involves the actions to cease the acts of infringement or request to determine the global/jurisdictional FRAND rate, etc., the parties mostly file the lawsuit in multiple jurisdictions, which is easy to cause jurisdictional conflict. Our country can reasonably reform the conservatory of behavior system to decide whether to issue “anti-suit injunction”. That can be considered in three aspects: Whether the domestic litigation and foreign litigation are the same or related subject matter. Factor “likely to suffer irreparable harm” and “judgments are hard to enforce” reflect on the consideration of whether the fair development and enforcement of domestic litigation may be impeded by the execution of foreign litigation and whether the balance of equities tips in applicant's favor. Whether the influence on international comity is intolerable by other jurisdictions. |
| Key words: Standard Essential Patent, Conservatory of Behavior, Preliminary Injunction, Anti-Suit Injunction |
