| 摘要: |
| 刑民交叉案件是刑事案件与民事案件共存于一案的案件，以解决同一行为人的刑事责任和民事责任为依归。因而刑民交叉案件的办理，既要以同一法律事实为前提，又应以同一法律关系为必要。规范冲突范式和目的冲突范式从抽象的法秩序统一层面提出的“排除冲突”标准，有失空泛、笼统，既不能信服地回答规范冲突之问，也不能有效地开出目的冲突解决之方。只有立足于刑法与其前置法在中国特色社会主义法律体系中的具体规范关系，秉持“前置法定性与刑事法定量相统一”的刑事犯罪的生成与认定机理，才能为刑民交叉问题的解决另辟理论路径，进而捍卫刑法的保障法定位，实现刑法的谦抑性要求。 |
| 关键词: 刑民交叉 冲突范式 规范关系 定罪机制 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:中国人民大学科学研究基金（中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助）项目“国家纵向治理体系现代化和法治化若干重大问题研究”（项目编号： 22XNL004） |
|
| A Study of Criminal civil Overlap： Theoretical Paradigms and Practice Approach |
|
Tian Hongjie
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| A criminal-civil overlapping case refers to those where criminal case and civil case co-exist, the starting point and objective of which are to clarify the civil liability and criminal liability of the same perpetrator. Hence, to properly handle a criminal-civil case requires setting the same facts as a precondition and requires the same legal relations as an essence. The paradigm of normative conflict and the paradigm of purposive conflict provide a criterion to “exclude conflicts” from the perspective of abstract unification of legal order, which is unconvincing for its vagueness and ambiguousness. The criterion fails to persuasively respond to the question of norm conflicts, also it fails to make a prescription for purposive conflicts. Only based on the concrete normative relation between criminal law and its prepositioning laws in the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, upholding the crime-determination mechanism of “unifying prepositioning laws that determine nature and the criminal law determines degree”, can be an effective and delicate solution to solve the criminal-civil problem be created, hence defending the orientation of criminal law as a protective law and fulfilling the requirement of the modesty of criminal law. |
| Key words: Criminal-civil Overlap, Paradigm of Normative Contradiction, Basic Theory on the Normative Relation, Conviction Mechanism, Connection Procedure |
