• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:刘玉姿:从管制到征收:管制性征收的生成逻辑——基于美国法的考察,载《交大法学》2022年第4期,第105~121页。
Liu Yuzi, From Regulation to Condemnation: The Creation Logic of Regulatory Takings— Based on American Law, (4) SJTU LAW REVIEW 105-121 (2022).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1916次   下载 1491次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
从管制到征收:管制性征收的生成逻辑——基于美国法的考察
刘玉姿1
厦门大学法学院
摘要:
19世纪的美国法严格区分管制与征收,两者在行为模式、目的限度、救济方式上泾渭分明。但自20世纪初期以来,伴随着土地用途管制愈演愈烈、财产权概念与地位急剧变迁,两者的传统区别被逐渐打破或连通,不再是政府行为类型之别而只是财产损害程度之异。管制性征收就此生成。然而,管制性征收的生成并未带来融贯的理论,甚至在实践中冷遇不断。探究管制性征收的生成逻辑有助于重新认识国家权力与财产权的关系,提供挖掘管制性征收中国法资源的参照。
关键词:  管制 征收 管制性征收 财产权
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国征收法的体系化研究”(项目编号: 21AFX006)
From Regulation to Condemnation: The Creation Logic of Regulatory Takings— Based on American Law
Liu Yuzi
Abstract:
There were strict distinctions between regulation and condemnation in action patterns, purpose limitations and remedy approaches in American law of the nineteenth century. However, since the beginning of the twentieth century, their traditional distinctions have been broken or connected gradually, whose difference is not of kinds, but of degrees, and thus the idea of regulatory takings comes into being. But the creation of regulatory takings does not bring a coherent theory, not to mention is widely accepted in practice. The exploration of the creation logic of regulatory takings will help to re understand the relationship between the state power and property rights, and serve as a mirror for digging the local resources of regulatory takings.
Key words:  Regulation, Condemnation, Regulatory Takings, Property Rights
您是本站第  4067345  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司