| 摘要: |
| 摘要由于封闭数字平台的兴起和扩张，当下互联网的开放性正饱受质疑。从互联网诞生以来，“开放”就成为一种意识形态，随着互联网逐渐嵌入社会政治经济生活的各个方面，不断促成各类社会主体和事物之间的连接，形成愈加复杂的网络，很难简单地针对这一争议问题给出一刀切的答案。人们也常常忽视一些给定的基本假定和话术，从而有意无意忽视开放封闭话语背后的利益关系。开放封闭话语是围绕着某种抽象的“架构”权益而不断变化的，有必要超越单纯的以平台企业为核心的开放封闭论述，重新回到问题的实质，即互联网如何便利生产要素流动性和建设强劲的基础设施两个维度，在制度上进一步探索如何推进更大范围内要素安全有序流动的数字市场和社会。 |
| 关键词: 开放 封闭 架构 流动性 基础设施 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金一般项目“中国网络法的演进模式研究”（项目编号： 17BFX027） |
|
| The Openness and Closing of the Internet and According Legal Response |
|
Hu Ling
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Because of the rise and expansion of closed digital platforms， the openness of current internet is being questioned. Ever since the birth of the internet， openness has become a typical ideology. However， as the internet gradually embedded into every aspect of social， political and economic lives and enabled the connection among all sorts of social subjects and things， therefore forming a more and more complex network， it is difficult to give an answer to the controversy once and for all. When talking about the issue， people would always ignore some given assumptions and discourses， thus ignore the interests behind the openness closing discourse， intentionally or not. Actually， the openness closing discourse has been evolving surrounding the abstract interest of architecture. It is necessary to go beyond the current discourse based on platform enterprises and go back to the key point， that is， how would the internet facilitate the free flow of productive resources and the establishment of a robust infrastructure in the digital market， so as to explore how to expand the digital market and society institutionally. |
| Key words: Openness, Closing, Architecture, Mobility, Infrastructure |
