| 摘要: |
| 构筑于科斯定理与外部性理论的排放权交易机制强调市场的规制功能。然而,环境政策是包含着多元、多层次价值序列的复合系统，经济学角度的社会成本分析不足以为其提供完全的正当性。就排放权交易机制而言，对私权的过度强化可能导致偏离公共目的，总量控制特征和不同分配模式也会使政策收益与负担不均衡地分布于群体之间。排放权的功利主义特征和内部构造中的固有矛盾，已在欧美实践过程中产生诸多不良反馈。环境公共政策包含了广泛而深刻的生态及社会价值，这些多角度的价值目标不能从经济层面得到完整表达，资源配置就无法涵盖公共属性的每一层意旨。在进行环境制度设计时，不仅需要成本效益的分析，还应纳入法学理论、法学价值和公正层面的考量，如此才能真正实现经济效用与生态、社会效用的和谐统一。 |
| 关键词: 排放权交易 科斯定理 混合财产权 功利主义 污染者付费原则 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Speculation on the Legitimacy of Emission Trading—An Empirical Analysis Based on European and American Experience |
|
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The emission trading mechanism based on Coase Theorem and Externality emphasizes the regulatory function of the market. However, the environmental policy is a complex system containing multiple and multi level value sequences, and the social cost analysis from the economic point of view is not enough to provide full justification. As for the emission trading mechanism, the excessive reinforcement of private rights may lead to deviation from public purpose, and the total emission control characteristics as well as different distribution modes will also unbalance the income and burdens of the policy among different groups. The utilitarian features of emission trading and the inherent contradictions in its internal structure have produced a lot of adverse feedback in the process of European and American practice. The environmental policy contains extensive and profound ecological and social value, if the multi angle value cannot get a complete expression from the economic aspect, the allocation of resources will not be able to cover all the connotations of public attributes. When designing the system, not only the cost benefit analysis, but also the legal theory, the legal value and the justice should be taken into consideration, so that the harmony of economic, ecology and social utility can be realized. |
| Key words: Emission Trading,Coase Theorem,Hybrid Property Right,Utilitarianism,Polluter Pays Principle |
