| 摘要: |
| 指导案例83号涉及了通知制度中的两项关键问题:合格通知的要件和必要措施的范围。尽管该案的裁判要点给出了妥当的规则,但裁判理由却不足为训。投诉人的单方侵权声明无法满足"侵权初步证据"要件,应允许网络服务提供者将侵权比对表和订单编号设置为投诉必备材料。在收到合格通知后,网络服务提供者应采取删除等能有效阻止损害扩大的措施。除非采取此类措施有悖于比例原则,否则转通知不足以作为必要措施。 |
| 关键词: 通知移除、必要措施、转通知、嘉易烤、专利权 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Determination of Qualified Notification and Necessary Measures for Online Infringement — Comments on Guiding Case No．83 |
|
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Guiding case No．83 refers to two critical issues of the notice and takedown system： elements of the qualified notification and the scope of the necessary measure． The main points of the adjudication are reasonable， while the reasons for the adjudication are unacceptable． The “prima facie evidence of the infringement” element cannot be met by the single statement from the complainant． The requirement of the infringement analysis comparison form and the purchase order number should be respected if the Internet service provider sets them as the necessary materials for the complaint． The Internet service provider should take measures， such as deletion， which can terminate the infringement directly once receiving the notification． Unless these measures do not comply with the principle of proportionality， forwarding the notification should not be treated as a necessary measure． |
| Key words: Notice and Takedown, Necessary Measures, Forward the Notification, Jia Yi Kao, Patent |
