• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:章剑生:面向司法审查的行政行为说明理由——郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案评析,载《交大法学》2020年第2期,第184~192页。
Zhang Jiansheng, Reason Giving for Administrative Action for Judicial Review— An Appraisal and Analysis of the Retrial Decision of Chenzhou Fanlongdui Mining Co., Ltd. and the Ministry of Land and Resources,2020 (2) SJTU LAW REVIEW 184-192 (2020).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3819次   下载 3297次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
面向司法审查的行政行为说明理由——郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案评析
章剑生1
浙江大学法学院
摘要:
郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案争点之一是行政行为说明理由。在司法审查中,对于涉及专业性判断理由的审查,法院应当保持对行政必要的尊重。将“程序过程审查”作为一种司法审查的方式导入本案,使得法院审查更具有针对性,审查方法也呈多元化。对于行政行为不说明理由的,可以认定为适用法律、法规错误。
关键词:  行政行为说明理由 程序过程审查 司法审查 专业性判断
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Reason Giving for Administrative Action for Judicial Review— An Appraisal and Analysis of the Retrial Decision of Chenzhou Fanlongdui Mining Co., Ltd. and the Ministry of Land and Resources
Zhang Jiansheng
Abstract:
One of the disputes in the retrial of administrative reconsideration decision of Chenzhou Fanlongdui Mining Co., Ltd. v. the Ministry of Land and Resources is the reason giving for the administrative action. In judicial review, the court shall maintain the necessary respect to administration when reviewing the grounds of professional judgment. The introduction of the “procedural review” as a judicial review method has made the court review more targeted and the review methods have been diversified. If there is no reason given for the administrative action, it could be regarded as an error in the applicable laws and regulations.
Key words:  Reason Giving for Administrative Action, Procedural Review, Judicial Review,Professional Judgment
您是本站第  4224740  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学凯原法学楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司