摘要: |
当前的著作权兜底条款存在学理定位不清与适用机理不明的问题。解决此问题,首先需要廓清权利法定原则在知识产权法中的本来面目。知识产权法定应作设权原则来理解,而非功利主义权利观的替代表述,其制度目的在于通过证成权利公示来实现权利的对世性。著作权亦须遵循知识产权法定原则,其内涵包括权利类型法定和内容法定。以证成权利公示的规范目的为准,兜底条款并不违背著作权法定原则。法学方法上,著作权兜底条款构成隐藏的法律漏洞,法院需经目的性限缩后援引适用,条款中“应当由权利人享有”合理的解释是“能以一定形式公示”。在个案中,法院除了要明确法律漏洞确系存在外,还应当从结果层面考虑适用著作权兜底条款可能带来的影响。 |
关键词: 著作权兜底条款 知识产权法定 权利公示 隐藏的法律漏洞 目的性限缩 |
DOI: |
分类号: |
基金项目: |
|
On the Application of the Copyright Cave Clause: From the Perspective of Numerus Clausus of Property |
bauruicheng
|
|
Abstract: |
The academic orientation and application mechanism of copyright cave clause are unclear. Solving this problem, it is necessary to clarify the original features of Numerus Clausus of rights in intellectual property law. The Numerus Clausus of rights in intellectual property law should be understood as the principle of establishing rights, rather than the alternative expression of the utilitarian view of rights, and its purpose is to realize the absoluteness of rights through the demonstration of rights. Copyright also follow this principle, which includes legal right type and legal content. In accordance with the normative purpose, the copyright cave clause does not violate the Numerus Clausus of Intellectual Property. In terms of legal method, the copyright cave clause is a hidden legal loophole, the court needs to invoke it through purposive limitation. The reasonable interpretation of "shall be enjoyed by the right holder" in the clause is "can be publicized in a certain form". In juridical practice, the court should not only confirm the existence of the legal loophole, but also consider the possible impact of the application of the copyright cave clause from the perspective of consequences. |
Key words: copyright cave clause Numerus Clausus of Intellectual Property publication of right hidden legal loophole purposive limitation |