| 摘要: |
| 《生态环境法典》的编纂与实施，宣告我国生态环境法治迈入法典化发展的新时代，亦对既有地方生态环境立法格局产生深远影响。在多层级环境治理结构中，地方立法长期发挥着承接中央意志、回应区域诉求与引领制度创新的关键功能。法典的实施在重塑环境法体系统一性的同时，也对地方立法的制度空间与功能定位提出了精细化协同的新要求。在厘清《生态环境法典》与地方立法逻辑关联的基础上，从功能视角出发，将地方生态环境立法解构为依规细化类、局部增补类、空白填补类、因地制宜类与先行先试类五种范式，并剖析法典时代下地方立法面临的制度调适需求。地方生态环境立法应在恪守“不抵触、有特色、可操作”原则的基础上，通过优化立法技术衔接、深化区域协同立法、补强新兴领域制度供给等路径，化解法典体系的“稳定性”与地方治理“灵活性”之间的潜在张力，从而实现我国生态环境法治体系的整体跃升与协调发展。 |
| 关键词: 《生态环境法典》 地方环境立法 法典化 立法适应 协同机制 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“资源共享机制错位下维护中国深海权益法治保障研究”（项目编号： 2025BFX012） |
|
| Functional Positioning and Adaptive Mechanisms of Local Environmental Legislation under the Implementation of the Ecological and Environmental Code |
|
Shen Hao
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| The codification and implementation of the Ecological and Environmental Code mark China’s entry into a new era of codified ecological and environmental rule of law, while also exerting profound impacts on the existing structure of local environmental legislation. Within the multi-level environmental governance system, local legislation has long played a pivotal role in implementing central policies, responding to regional demands, and leading institutional innovation. While the implementation of the Code enhances the systemic coherence of environmental law, it also imposes more refined and coordinated requirements on the institutional space and functional positioning of local legislation. Based on an analysis of the logical relationship between the Ecological and Environmental Code and local legislation, this article deconstructs local ecological environmental legislation from a functional perspective into five categories: rule-implementing and specification-detailing legislation, supplementary legislation, gap-filling legislation, context-specific legislation, and pilot or experimental legislation. It further examines the institutional adjustment needs faced by local legislation in the era of codification. Local environmental legislation should, while adhering to the principles of “no contradiction, local distinctiveness, and operability”, address the potential tension between the Code‘s systemic stability and the flexibility required for local governance by optimizing legislative technical coordination, strengthening regional collaborative legislation, and enhancing institutional supply in emerging fields. In doing so, it contributes to the overall upgrading and coordinated development of China’s ecological and environmental legal system. |
| Key words: Ecological and Environmental Code, Local Environmental Legislation, Codification, Legislative Adaptation, Coordination Mechanism |
