• 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 审稿指南
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
引用本文:王先林:整治地方政府“内卷式”竞争中公平竞争制度的实施机制——基于公平竞争审查与行政性垄断规制的双重视角,载《交大法学》2026年第4期,第5~19页。
Wang Xianlin, The Implementation Mechanism of Fair Competition System in Addressing the “Involutionary” Competition Among Local Governments—A Dual Perspective Based on Fair Competition Review and Regulation of Administrative Monopolies, (4) SJTU LAW REVIEW 5-19 (2026).
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 978次   下载 768次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
整治地方政府“内卷式”竞争中公平竞争制度的实施机制——基于公平竞争审查与行政性垄断规制的双重视角
王先林1
上海交通大学凯原法学院
摘要:
地方政府“内卷式”竞争是制约全国统一大市场建设与经济高质量发展的突出障碍,总体上属于滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争的行为。公平竞争制度以公平竞争审查与行政性垄断规制为双支柱,构成治理地方政府“内卷式”竞争的核心法治路径。地方政府“内卷式”竞争集中表现为招商引资恶性比拼、产业布局同质化与地方保护市场分割,其治理依赖源头预防与事后矫正的协同发力。公平竞争审查承担事前预防功能,可有效规制违法财税优惠、选择性补贴与新型“基金招商”内卷;行政性垄断规制发挥事后矫正作用,能够查处滥用行政权力设置市场壁垒、破坏竞争秩序的行为。通过程序衔接、标准统一、责任联动与跨区域协同,可形成“事前审查—事后执法—协同保障”的全链条实施机制,为强化竞争政策基础地位、破除地方保护与市场分割、深入整治地方政府“内卷式”竞争提供制度支撑。
关键词:  地方政府内卷式竞争 公平竞争制度 公平竞争审查 行政性垄断规制
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
The Implementation Mechanism of Fair Competition System in Addressing the “Involutionary” Competition Among Local Governments—A Dual Perspective Based on Fair Competition Review and Regulation of Administrative Monopolies
Wang Xianlin
Abstract:
The “involution-style” competition among local governments is a prominent obstacle to the construction of a unified national market and high-quality economic development. In essence, it constitutes an act of administrative monopoly involving the abuse of administrative power to exclude or restrict competition. The fair competition system, with its two pillars—fair competition review and administrative monopoly regulation—forms the core legal pathway for rectifying this “involution-style” competition. Such competition is manifested primarily in vicious bidding wars for investment, homogeneous industrial layouts, and market segmentation due to local protectionism; its governance relies on the synergistic efforts of source prevention and ex-post correction. The fair competition review undertakes the function of ex-ante prevention, effectively regulating illegal fiscal and tax preferences, selective subsidies, and the new form of “involution” via fund-based investment attraction. Conversely, administrative monopoly regulation plays the role of ex-post correction, investigating and punishing acts that abuse administrative power to set up market barriers and disrupt competitive order. Through procedural coordination, unified standards, linked accountability, and cross-regional collaboration, a full-chain implementation mechanism of “ex-ante review—ex-post enforcement—collaborative guarantee” can be established. This provides institutional support for strengthening the fundamental status of competition policy, dismantling local protectionism and market segmentation, and deeply rectifying the “involution-style” competition of local governments.
Key words:  Local Governments, Involution-style Competition, Fair Competition System, Fair Competition Review, Regulation of Administrative Monopoly
您是本站第  7079564  位访问者!沪交ICP备20180131号
版权所有:《交大法学》编辑部
地址:上海市徐汇区华山路1954号上海交通大学慧谷科技楼    邮政编码:200030
电话:021-62933317   电子邮箱:lawreview@sjtu.edu.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司